%3Aformat(webp)%2Fday_detail%2Fd404b5b3-e0de-4acb-ab36-ef69d3278ecb-yves-alarie-okehq_ed4z4-unsplash.jpg&w=1920&q=75)
%3Aformat(webp)%2Fday_detail%2Fd404b5b3-e0de-4acb-ab36-ef69d3278ecb-yves-alarie-okehq_ed4z4-unsplash.jpg&w=1920&q=75)
Sri Lanka is the gentler introduction to South Asia. India is the more overwhelming and, for many travellers, the more extraordinary. If you have never travelled in the region, start with Sri Lanka.
That is not a comment on quality. Rajasthan is one of the great journeys anywhere. It is a comment on how much a country asks of you in the first forty-eight hours, and on what you want a fortnight to feel like.
In short
Sri Lanka: Culture, Nature & Beaches — 15 days. Colombo and the Dutch fort at Galle, an elephant safari at Udawalawe, three nights in the hill country at Ella with the famous tea-country train, Kandy, then the cultural triangle — Sigiriya, Polonnaruwa and Anuradhapura — and finally three days on the quiet east coast at Trincomalee.
Rajasthan: Desert & Secret Palaces — 13 days. Udaipur and its lake palaces, the marble temple at Ranakpur, the blue city of Jodhpur, a night among nomadic communities in the Thar desert, the sacred lake at Pushkar, Jaipur and its Palace of Winds, a tiger safari at Ranthambore, Fatehpur Sikri, the Taj Mahal at sunrise, and Delhi.
Sri Lanka ends by doing nothing. Rajasthan ends in the biggest city on the itinerary.
%3Aformat(webp)%2Ftrip%2F986e8d7d-e396-4c5e-94ca-cc9bfd167a9a-galle-fort-01.jpg&w=1920&q=75)
This is the real difference, and the reason for our recommendation.
India is a great deal to absorb. It is loud, crowded, brilliant and relentless, and first-time visitors are commonly overwhelmed around the second day. That is normal, it passes, and travelling in a small group with a guide who reads the situation changes the experience entirely. But it is real, and anyone who tells you otherwise has not watched it happen.
Sri Lanka is calmer. It has crowds and heat and traffic too, but on a scale that does not flatten people. Travellers who are nervous about the region almost always find Sri Lanka easier to settle into.
So: if you are curious about South Asia but slightly apprehensive, Sri Lanka. If you have travelled somewhere demanding before and want the fuller experience, Rajasthan.
%3Aformat(webp)%2Fpage_builder%2Fc0a83ad3-0e54-4592-ad76-3be1987dd735-kar_canva_stupa-in-anuradhapura-sri-lanka.png&w=1920&q=75)
Both are moderate, with different specifics.
Heat. Sri Lanka is tropical year-round, with the hill country as the main relief and our itinerary front-loading sightseeing into mornings. Rajasthan is a desert state that becomes punishing from spring onwards, so departures sit in the cooler months — even then, forts are approached uphill in the sun.
Steps. Sri Lanka's are concentrated at Sigiriya, a climb of hundreds of steps including exposed metal staircases against the rock. It is entirely optional and travellers do sit it out. Rajasthan's are spread across fort and palace ascents throughout.
Neither involves trekking or carrying your own luggage, and both keep the walking to a few hours at a time with pauses.
Our guides to two weeks in Sri Lanka and two weeks in Rajasthan set both routes out day by day.
%3Aformat(webp)%2Fday_detail%2F5dce0073-d6c4-402c-93d6-d04bae3ecaa6-galle-fort-01.jpg&w=1920&q=75)
Flights. Sri Lanka is a single-airport trip, in and out of Colombo. Rajasthan flies into Udaipur and home from Delhi, so it needs a multi-city ticket.
Visas. UK citizens currently need a free ETA for Sri Lanka, applied for online. India requires a paid e-Visa. Both change — check the current position before you travel.
Pace. Sri Lanka has two- and three-night stops and a beach finish. Rajasthan is a moving itinerary with a maximum of two nights in most places.
Wildlife. Sri Lanka's Udawalawe is superb for elephants. Rajasthan's Ranthambore is a tiger reserve — sightings are never guaranteed anywhere, and tigers less than most.
Both trips are land-only, run on guaranteed departures, and carry a maximum of 12 travellers with a Karmaventura guide throughout.
%3Aformat(webp)%2Fe2bb4d75-c0a9-4d02-9c00-5ff2250680c1-mariana-proenca-5o3odxrqcfi-unsplash.jpg&w=1920&q=75)
Sri Lanka if this is your first trip to South Asia, if you want variety in a small package, if you would like the holiday to end with three days doing nothing, or if you are travelling with someone apprehensive about the region.
Rajasthan if you have travelled somewhere demanding before, if palaces and Mughal history are what draw you, if the Taj Mahal is on your list, and if you can travel in the cooler months.
Both, eventually. A good number of our travellers do Sri Lanka first and India second, and say the order was right.
Tell a specialist what you are apprehensive about — heat, crowds, steps, pace — and they will tell you straight which of the two fits, including when the answer is neither this year.
If you are comparing more widely, our guide to which Asian country to visit first sets these two against Japan, Thailand, Vietnam and China.
Contact us
We’d love to hear from you. Please fill out this form.
All fields marked with (*) are mandatory.